Renovation of England’s national stadium is falling further and further behind schedule, and the FA is scrambling to reschedule and move important matches:
The Football Association has confirmed another delay in the Wembley project after revealing all matches planned for 2006 will be moved to other venues.
Work on the stadium will not be completed in time for an England friendly in August and two Euro 2008 qualifiers in September and October.
The Community Shield on 13 August will be moved - probably to Cardiff.
[…]
Builders Multiplex announced on Friday that it hoped most of the remaining work on the 90,000 seat venue would be completed by the end of the June.
However, the firm said it was entitled to a further extension under the terms of its contract in order to put the finishing touches to the project.
This would extend the completion date until at least the end of September - a year later than the original deadline.
Friday was the official deadline for the handover of the £757million stadium from Multiplex to the FA.
Three deadlines with the Australian builders have already been missed, and when the handover does eventually take place the FA will need at least three months to test and fit out the stadium.
Journalist and blogger Stephen Pollard says the stadium won’t be ready until 2008. Here’s my question: the greater London area already has several large, world-class sporting facilities, and Arsenal’s 60,000-seat Emirates Stadium is scheduled to open later this year. And that’s not even counting the Millenium Stadium, Old Trafford and City of Manchester Stadium. Maybe I’m missing something here, but why does Great Britain need a “national” stadium in the first place?
Damian P.